Advertisement
Regular paper| Volume 2, ISSUE 5, P371-375, September 1991

A three-year photopatch study in Thailand

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Photopatch testing was performed on 274 patients who had history of photosensitivity at the Institute of Dermatology Thailand from 1987 through 1989. A total of 92 positive photocontact reactions and 71 positive contact reactions were seen. The most frequent positive photopatch test reactions were to sulfanilamide (18.2%) followed by Jadit (4.4%) chlorpromazine (3.6%) promethazine (3.6%) and fenticlor (3.2%). The most common photodermatoses was polymorphous light eruption (60.9%). Photocontact dermatitis was established in 28 patients (10.2%) while other skin diseases aggravated by sunlight were seen in 47 patients (17.2%).

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Dermatological Science
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Epstein JH
        • Wuepper KD
        • Maibach HI
        Photocontact dermatitis to halogenated salicylanilides and related compounds: a clinical and histologic review of 26 patients.
        Arch Dermatol. 1968; 97: 236-244
        • Horio T
        • Higuchi T
        Photocontact dermatitis from p-aminobenzoic acid.
        Dermatologica. 1978; 156: 124-128
        • Marmelzat J
        • Rapaport MJ
        Photodermatitis with PABA.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1980; 6: 230-231
        • Jackson RT
        • Nesbitt Jr, LT
        • De Leo VA
        6-Methylcoumarin photocontact dermatitis.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980; 2: 124-127
        • Raugi GJ
        • Storrs FJ
        Photosensitivity from men's cologne.
        Arch Dermatol. 1979; 115: 106
        • Burry JM
        • Hunter GA
        Photocontact dermatitis from Jadit.
        Br J Dermatol. 1970; 82: 224-229
        • Epstein S
        Chlorpromazine sensitivity: phototoxic and photoallergic reactions.
        Arch Dermatol. 1968; 98: 354-363
        • Thune P
        • Jansen C
        • Wennersten G
        • Rystedt I
        • Brodthagen H
        • McFadden N
        The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study 1980–1985: final report.
        Photodermatology. 1988; 5: 261-269
        • Menz J
        • Muller SA
        • Connolly SM
        Photopatch testing: a six-year experience.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988; 18: 1044-1047
        • Thune P
        Contact and photocontact allergy to sunscreens.
        Photodermatology. 1984; 1: 5-9
        • Ramsay DL
        • Cohen HJ
        • Baer RL
        Allergic reaction to benzophenone.
        Arch Dermatol. 1972; 105: 906-908
        • Calnan CD
        Cinnamon dermatitis from an ointment.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1976; 2: 167-170
        • Giovinazzo VJ
        • Harber LC
        • Bickers DR
        • Armstrong RB
        Photoallergic contact dermatitis to musk ambrette: histopathologic features of photobiologic reactions observed in a persistent light reactor.
        Arch Dermatol. 1981; 117: 344-348
        • Burry JN
        Persistent light reaction associated with sensitivity to musk ambrette.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1981; 7: 46-47
        • Jackson RT
        • Nesbit Jr, LT
        • Deleo VA
        6-methylcoumarin photocontact dermatitis.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980; 2: 124-127
        • Schauder S.
        • Ippen H.
        Photoallergic and allergic contact dermatitis from dibenzoylmethanes.
        Photodermatology. 1986; 3: 140-147
        • Motley RJ
        • Reynolds AJ
        Photocontact dermatitis due to isopropyl and butylmethoxydibenzoylmethanes (Eusolex 8020 and Parsol 1789).
        Contact Dermatitis. 1989; 21: 109-110