Advertisement
Research paper| Volume 10, ISSUE 2, P159-165, September 1995

A study of skin responses to follow-up, rechallenge and combined effects of irritants using non-invasive measurements

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Irritant contact dermatitis is a common clinical problem. Primary irritation can be easily recognized, but cumulative irritation by daily exposure is hard to be diagnosed and the condition may fail to be clear even away from work. The mechanism of irritant dermatitis produced by repeated or combined exposure to clinical or subclinical doses of irritants is still poorly understood. In order to find out whether the subclinical doses of irritants affect each other by repeated or combined exposure according to their concentrations, non-invasive measurements, transepidermal water loss and laser Doppler flowmetry were used. Sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium hydroxide and benzalkonium chloride were serially diluted and patch-tested with large Finn chambers on Scanpor tape on the back of normal human volunteers and responses were followed up for 7 days. Twice repeated exposure with subclinical doses of irritants at 1 day intervals were also performed. Repeated daily applications for 5 days with subclinical doses of single or premixed irritants were performed to know the combined irritating effect. The irritant response was well correlated to the concentration of the irritants. However, increased response was not observed when subclinical doses were rechallenged on the previously patch tested sites. Twice-repeated exposure of subclinical doses of irritants increased skin irritancy when measured by transepidermal water loss and laser Doppler flowmetry. Some correlation and some discrepancies were observed between different evaluation methods in combined and repeated application tests with irritants of subclinical doses. Responses of skin irritancy induced by subclinical doses showed somewhat different pattern from that given strong irritants. So, when evaluating the patients suspicious of irritant dermatitis, patch testing with the possible combination of the irritants or repeated test may be helpful to verify their effect on the skin even at a weak concentration.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Dermatological Science
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Adams RM
        Occupational skin disease.
        Grune & Stratton, New York1983 (3rd)
        • Freeman S
        • Maibach HI
        Study of irritant dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss and laser Doppler velosimetry.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988; 19: 496-502
        • Agner T
        • Serup J
        Sodium lauryl sulfate for irritant patch testing — a dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation.
        J Invest Dermatol. 1990; 95: 543-547
        • Agner T
        • Serup J
        Individual and instrumental variations in irritant patch-test reactions — clinical evaluaton and quantification by bioengineering methods.
        Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990; 15: 29-33
        • McLelland J
        • Shuster S
        Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination.
        Br J Dermatol. 1990; 122: 623-630
        • McLelland J
        • Shuster S
        • Mathews JNS
        ‘Irritants’ increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis.
        Arch Dermatol. 1991; 127: 1016-1019
        • Agner T
        • Serup J
        Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1989; 20: 352-359
        • Larsen CG
        • Ternowitz T
        • Larsen FG
        ETAF/Interleukin-1 and epidermal lymphocyte chemotactic factor in epidermis underlying an irritant patch test.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1989; 20: 335-340
        • Godessart N
        • Puig L
        • Alomar A
        Sodium lauryl sulfate stimulates the metabolism of endogenous arachidonic acids in epidermal cell suspensions (abstr).
        Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 23: 235
        • Oxholm A
        • Oxholm P
        • Avnstorp C
        Keratinocyte expression of interleukin-6 but not of tumour necrosis factor-α is increased in the allergic and the irritant patch test reaction.
        Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh). 1991; 71: 93-98
        • Calnan CD
        Compound allergy to a cosmetic.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1975; 1: 123
        • Frosch PJ
        • Czarnetzki BM
        Surfactants cause in vitro chemotaxis and chemokinesis of human neutrophils.
        J Invest Dermatol. 1987; 88: 52s-55s
        • Maibach HI
        • Lowe NJ
        Models in Dermatology.
        in: 3rd ed. Karger, Basel1989: 12-19