Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 53, ISSUE 3, P207-211, March 2009

The SCINEXA: A novel, validated score to simultaneously assess and differentiate between intrinsic and extrinsic skin ageing

      Abstract

      Background

      Studies on the pathogenesis of skin ageing as well as efficacy testing of cosmetic and aesthetic measures to prevent or reverse skin ageing require – as an easy to use method – a validated non-invasive clinical score, which allows to simultaneously assess and differentiate between intrinsic (=chronological) and extrinsic (=photo-) skin ageing. Such an ideal score, however, does currently not exist.

      Objectives

      We developed a novel skin ageing score ‘SCINEXA’ comprising 5 items indicative of intrinsic and 18 items highly characteristic of extrinsic skin ageing. These items were used to define an index (indexdiscr) that allowed differentiating between intrinsic versus extrinsic skin ageing. In order to validate the ‘SCINEXA’, we asked whether it can be used to discriminate regular sunbed users, which have been chronically exposed to ultraviolet radiation and thus are prone to photoageing, from non-sunbed users, which were considered paradigmatic for intrinsic skin ageing.

      Methods

      For this purpose, 58 non-sunbed users and 16 regularly sunbed users were assessed. In addition to the clinical examination of the 23 score items potential confounders were considered by questionnaire.

      Results

      By employing the indexdiscr, we were able to classify 92% of all study subjects correctly as sunbed or non-sunbed users. Specifically, an index above 2 was associated with sunbed use and thus extrinsic skin ageing, whereas an index below 2 indicated intrinsic skin ageing.

      Conclusion

      The novel ‘SCINEXA’ is suitable for the simultaneous assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic skin ageing.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Dermatological Science
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Yarosh D.
        The new science of perfect skin: understanding skin care myths and miracles for radiant skin at any age.
        Broadway Books, New York2008
        • Guinot C.
        • Malvy D.J.
        • Ambroisine L.
        • et al.
        Relative contribution of intrinsic vs extrinsic factors to skin ageing as determined by a validated skin age score.
        Arch Dermatol. 2002; 138: 1454-1460
        • Daniell H.W.
        Smoker's wrinkles. A study in the epidemiology of “crow's feet”.
        Ann Intern Med. 1971; 75: 873-880
        • Griffiths C.E.
        • Wang T.S.
        • Hamilton T.A.
        • et al.
        A photonumeric scale for the assessment of cutaneous photodamage.
        Arch Dermatol. 1992; 128: 347-351
        • Larnier C.
        • Ortonne J.P.
        • Venot A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of cutaneous photodamage using a photographic scale.
        Br J Dermatol. 1994; 130: 167-173
        • Tsukahara K.
        • Takema Y.
        • Kazama H.
        • et al.
        A photographic scale for the assessment of human facial wrinkles.
        J Cosmet Sci. 2000; 51: 127-139
        • Day D.J.
        • Littler C.M.
        • Swift R.W.
        • et al.
        The wrinkle severity rating scale.
        Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004; 5: 49-52
        • Scharffetter-Kochanek K.
        Photoaging of the connective tissue of skin: its prevention and therapy.
        Adv Pharmacol. 1977; 38: 639-655
        • Kligman A.M.
        • Kligman L.H.
        Photoaging.
        in: Dermatology in General Medicine. vol. II. Mc Graw-Hill, New York, NY1993: 2972-2979
        • Green A.C.
        Premature ageing of the skin in a Queensland population.
        Med J Aust. 1991; 155 (477n 478): 473-474
        • Yaar M.
        Clinical and histological features of intrinsic versus extrinsic skin aging.
        in: Gilchrest B.A. Krutmann J. Skin Aging. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg2006: 9-21
        • Jackson R.
        Elderly and sun-affected skin.
        Can Fam Phys. 2001; 47: 1236-1243
        • Yaar M.
        • Gilchrest B.A.
        Skin aging: postulated mechanisms and consequent changes in structure and function.
        Clin Geriatr Med. 2001; 17: 617-630
        • Gilchrest B.A.
        • Rogers G.
        Photoaging.
        in: Lim H. Soter N. Clinical photomedicine. Marcel Dekker, New York1993: 95-111
        • Yaar M.
        • Gilchrest B.A.
        Photoageing: mechanism, prevention and therapy.
        Br J Dermatol. 2007; 157: 874-887
        • Purba M.B.
        • Kouris-Blazos A.
        • Wattanapenpaiboon N.
        • et al.
        Can skin wrinkling in a site that has received limited sun exposure be used as a marker of health status and biological age?.
        Age Ageing. 2001; 30: 227-234
        • Yin L.
        • Morita A.
        • Tsuji T.
        Skin ageing induced by ultraviolet exposure and tobacco smoking: evidence from epidemiological and molecular studies.
        Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2001; 17: 178-183
        • Fitzpatrick T.B.
        The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI.
        Arch Dermatol. 1988; 124: 869-871
        • Schofer A.
        • Krämer U.
        • Ranft U.
        • et al.
        Determinants of spot and wrinkle formation in German and Japanese women.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2008; S1: S80
        • Reimann V.
        • Kramer U.
        • Sugiri D.
        • et al.
        Sunbed use induces the photoaging-associated mitochondrial common deletion.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2008; 128: 1294-1297
      1. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products, European Commission (2006) opinion on biological effects of ultraviolet radiation reveal to health with particular reference to sunbeds for cosmetic purposes. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs(sccp_o_031b.pdf (accessed 2007).